PAMIRCUAS Technical Review

PAMILANGA · DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMME

TRUST THE
OUTCOME.
PROVE THE WHY.

PAMIR-CUAS reconstructs the evidence, timing and causal path behind Counter-UAS outcomes — from heterogeneous sensing to reproducible proof.

DOMAINCOUNTER-UASINPUTRADAR · RF · EO/IR · C2CORECAUSAL EVIDENCESTATEDEMONSTRATOR ACCEPTED
Context footage · Pexels licensed · not PAMIR-CUAS hardware

THE PROBLEM AFTER DETECTION

A decision is only as defensible as the evidence behind it.

Counter-UAS outcomes are assembled across sensors, clocks, associations and confidence transformations. A wrong result can originate far upstream from the final alert.

PAMIR-CUAS preserves those relationships as inspectable evidence — allowing engineering teams to reconstruct what changed, where trust degraded, and why the outcome followed.

SEECORRELATEQUESTIONEXPLAINREPLAYPROVE

CAUSAL EVIDENCE GRAPH

Follow the failure upstream.

Every material conclusion remains connected to its source observations, timing, associations and transformations.

VALID EVIDENCEANOMALYCOUNTERFACTUAL
RADARRFEO / IRTEMPORAL INTEGRITYASSOCIATIONCOUNTERFACTUALOUTCOME
CAUSE CANDIDATESTALE RF EVIDENCEΔt +184 msOUTCOME FLIPS WHEN EXCLUDED

NOT ANOTHER SENSOR DASHBOARD

Designed around the question most systems leave unanswered.

01

Causal Evidence Graph

Preserves lineage from source observation to final system outcome.

TRACE
02

Temporal Integrity Forensics

Exposes stale evidence, clock offset and out-of-order observations.

TIME
03

Sensor Disagreement Analysis

Surfaces conflicting evidence without collapsing uncertainty prematurely.

TRUST
04

Counterfactual Replay

Tests whether an outcome changes when suspect evidence is removed offline.

WHAT IF

RECOVERY WITH A GATE

Adaptation is not trusted
until it is validated.

DRE isolates a candidate recovery path, evaluates it against deterministic gates and retains the evidence required to explain promotion or rollback.

DETECT01ISOLATE02RECONFIGURE03VALIDATE04PROMOTE
GATE FAIL  →  ROLLBACK  →  RETAIN EVIDENCE

REPRODUCIBLE, NOT RHETORICAL

Evidence before adjectives.

Repository-level demonstrator acceptance is complete. The results below describe engineering validation; they do not claim field qualification or certification.

39/39AUTOMATED ACCEPTANCE TESTSPASS
3/3CAUSAL VALIDATION GATESPASS
R01–R03MMAUD REAL-DATA TEMPORAL ASSOCIATIONPASS
v0.1DETERMINISTIC EVIDENCE SCHEMAFROZEN
ACCEPTANCE RUN #488pytest -q   ....................................... [100%]   39 passed in 0.19sa4f77aac…

VENDOR-NEUTRAL EVIDENCE LAYER

Built between observation
and defensible trust.

OBSERVATIONRADARRFEO / IRC2
DETERMINISTIC TRUST LAYERPAMIR-CUAS

CAUSALITY · TEMPORAL INTEGRITY · REPLAY · RESILIENCE

OUTPUTVALIDATED EVIDENCEAUTHORIZED INTERFACE

PAMIR-CUAS provides evidence and mission assurance. Authorized external effectors remain outside PAMIR-CUAS control.

BLIND VALIDATION CHALLENGE

Unseen data.
Predeclared criteria.
No moving the goalposts.

The next evidence gate is designed around unseen controlled Counter-UAS data evaluated against acceptance criteria declared before analysis.

CONTROLLED DATAPREDECLARED GATESREPRODUCIBLE REPORT

CONTROLLED ENGAGEMENT

Bring us the
difficult case.

For controlled validation, technical review, research collaboration and system-integration discussions.

cuas@pamilanga.com ↗
Opens a prepared email to cuas@pamilanga.com. No data is stored on this website.